Renderings, minis, and news about this product line
Moderators: mjwest , Albiegamer
Jean
Site Admin
Posts: 1727 Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:17 pm
Post
by Jean » Tue Sep 13, 2011 2:58 am
SVC notes: Presumably, Sandrine's fixes to the NCL also apply to the NCA
Moved phaser-3s to bottom of saucer.
Removed plates under phaser bubbles.
Will fix the shuttle bay and make it connect to the garage on the NCL.
top
side
above
above front
below
top
Business Manager/RPG Line Editor
Amarillo Design Bureau, Inc.
phdillman
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 180 Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:28 pm
Post
by phdillman » Tue Sep 13, 2011 2:47 pm
Very nice! Sandrine is very talented.
Now to me the late GW ships can use some deviation of the clasic design to bring out that WOW factor that Mongoose is looking for. To wit, the small secondary hull and engine mount could be made larger, maybe even use that superstructure from the first draft of the CC on the bottom of the saucer and mount the third engine to that.
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407 Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:
Post
by djdood » Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:51 pm
My comments are all over on the legacy bbs.
For the benefit of those folks here that aren't there, here's the picture I put together with my comment markups -
NCA Comments Markup Drawing
SVC has already replied and said the sensor dishes will be the way Mongoose feels they need to do them. Not a huge loss, as they are easy to cut off and replace, should the person choose to (and I likely will). I'm more concerned about features that are molded-in and hard to change.
Jean
Site Admin
Posts: 1727 Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:17 pm
Post
by Jean » Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:16 pm
Take 2.
SVC notes: It should be good to go except for the phaser-3s on the bottom of the saucer.
side
rear
below
front
above rear
above front
top
Enjoy!
Business Manager/RPG Line Editor
Amarillo Design Bureau, Inc.
MacrossMartin
Ensign
Posts: 16 Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 1:10 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:
Post
by MacrossMartin » Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:34 am
That looks like it could hurt somebody...
"The belief in the possibility of a short, decisive war appears to be one of the most ancient and dangerous of Klingon illusions."
Aabh
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 134 Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:00 pm
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Contact:
Post
by Aabh » Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:38 am
Now THAT's a beauty! (And the reason I'm back in SFB is because of this ship!
) Secondary hull is much better... it might stand to be a little beefier, but I think that's just fine. I still feel the sensor dish might be a little small... But That might be just fine as well!
It's a beauty no matter how you slice her!
ctchapel
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 84 Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Federal Way, WA
Post
by ctchapel » Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:54 am
The aft hull still looks under sized to me, but if that's it, okay fine. Let's do it.
phdillman
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 180 Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:28 pm
Post
by phdillman » Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:09 pm
Much better! I think after the Ph-3 gets fixed and maybe a few more panals tothe shuttle bay door that this is a keeper!
Jim Lewis
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 121 Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 8:41 pm
Location: Campbell, CA USA
Contact:
Post
by Jim Lewis » Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:51 am
Tony, Will, anyone....
I'm all but finished painting my Starline 2500 NCA, but I wonder what the two raised circular details here on the aft bulkhead represent.
Are they Tractors? Sensors? Flush vents for ejecting Tribbles?
koogie
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 72 Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:41 am
Post
by koogie » Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:12 am
Likely the two drone racks.
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407 Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:
Post
by djdood » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:30 am
Nope. Not the drone racks. Those are tucked up under the "wings" of the engine support "yoke".
For my minis, I'll be painting these little cylinders gray and calling them vents. The NCL has the same number of tractors and doesn't have these features.
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751 Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee
Post
by Scoutdad » Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:46 pm
In the Starline 2500 range of Federation miniatures, drone racks are raised squares with a circular divot in the exact center where the drone tube is.
These are most likely extra details added for appearance. On mine, they will be called vents and painted appropriately.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Jim Lewis
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 121 Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 8:41 pm
Location: Campbell, CA USA
Contact:
Post
by Jim Lewis » Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:53 pm
Thank Guys!
Mine shall be grey Vents too!
Aabh
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 134 Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:00 pm
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Contact:
Post
by Aabh » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:47 pm
I painted them as nav lights, Red/Green. Just a thought.
-------
Guy Davis