
Will McCammon's SFU Art
Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer
Inspired by The Master, here's a quick and dirty photo composite I did of one of my minis:


Last edited by djdood on Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- The Master
- Lieutenant SG
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:23 pm
- Location: SWF
I'm not sure what you mean by "like a poster", but I can explain what I did.The Master wrote: ?? How did you get it to look like a poster.
The star background I had on-file (from Mojo Lebowitz, an FX artist on Battlestar Galactica, etc.).
The nebula is a googled Hubble telescope image.
I cropped out my mini photo and composited all three elements in GIMP (as well as some color and contrast adjustments to make it look cohesive).
- The Master
- Lieutenant SG
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:23 pm
- Location: SWF
- Orion's Sword
- Ensign
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:46 pm
- Location: Michigan
Awesome job on the ship page. I loved how you explained the change from rectangular to "circumferential" Very logical and beauacratic. I could almost hear the decision brief to the F4 while I was reading it.
P.S. I'm not sure circumferential (sp?) is a word
P.S.S. F4 is a play on the army/joint staff officer names. the 4 is in charge of logistics & supplies and the letter designates the officers level
S - brigade; G - Corps, J - Joint. I figured Star Fleet would use F for Fleet.
P.S. I'm not sure circumferential (sp?) is a word
P.S.S. F4 is a play on the army/joint staff officer names. the 4 is in charge of logistics & supplies and the letter designates the officers level
S - brigade; G - Corps, J - Joint. I figured Star Fleet would use F for Fleet.
Dale -
There's more, but I was definitely learning back then. As I find the ones worth posting, I'll put them up.
Can you tell I just found boxes of "my stuff" while cleaning out my Dad's garage?
DNordeen -
Thanks.
I assume you are talking about the pitch-page of a Fed FF I did as a proposal for Leanna's Fighting Starships, years back.
Circumferential. Yup, real word (adjective form of circumference).
That term for the "round" Fed engines comes from the Franz Joseph blueprints of the U.S.S. Enterprise (it might be in the Tech Manual too, I'd have to look). It got carried forward into all the other fanion blueprints, etc. .
Once the TOS movies started coming out (with the square, "art deco" engines, with the big warp core in the engineering hull), the fanion sources referred to them as "linear" type engines to explain the completely different look.
I have first-hand experience with aviation/shipbuilding/government bureaucracy and you're correct - this kind of thing happens all the time in that food-chain.
I thought it was a convenient way to explain away the change in the Fed FF mini.
From what I have read, the square-engine version was an attempt to make it easier to mold, but it wasn't really and it's been stated since that the square-engine version "never happened" in the SFU game-universe.
Military prototypes undergo huge changes before production all the time (the delta-winged Boeing Joint Strike Fighter competitor would have gained traditional horizontal and vertical tails for production, for example) and lots of artist's renderings, etc., float around for years with the erroneous configuration.
What we were seeing was the Federation media not updating their image files and still showing the prototype U.S.S. Burke in her as-built configuration, rather than as she and her sisterships looked in-service.
It seemed like a good fit.
There's more, but I was definitely learning back then. As I find the ones worth posting, I'll put them up.
Can you tell I just found boxes of "my stuff" while cleaning out my Dad's garage?
DNordeen -
Thanks.
I assume you are talking about the pitch-page of a Fed FF I did as a proposal for Leanna's Fighting Starships, years back.
Circumferential. Yup, real word (adjective form of circumference).
That term for the "round" Fed engines comes from the Franz Joseph blueprints of the U.S.S. Enterprise (it might be in the Tech Manual too, I'd have to look). It got carried forward into all the other fanion blueprints, etc. .
Once the TOS movies started coming out (with the square, "art deco" engines, with the big warp core in the engineering hull), the fanion sources referred to them as "linear" type engines to explain the completely different look.
I have first-hand experience with aviation/shipbuilding/government bureaucracy and you're correct - this kind of thing happens all the time in that food-chain.
I thought it was a convenient way to explain away the change in the Fed FF mini.
From what I have read, the square-engine version was an attempt to make it easier to mold, but it wasn't really and it's been stated since that the square-engine version "never happened" in the SFU game-universe.
Military prototypes undergo huge changes before production all the time (the delta-winged Boeing Joint Strike Fighter competitor would have gained traditional horizontal and vertical tails for production, for example) and lots of artist's renderings, etc., float around for years with the erroneous configuration.
What we were seeing was the Federation media not updating their image files and still showing the prototype U.S.S. Burke in her as-built configuration, rather than as she and her sisterships looked in-service.
It seemed like a good fit.
PDF files of some art I did in-preparation for the master-copy of the F-5W War Destroyer miniature have been posted on the new ADB Historical Downloads page:
F-5 Technical Readout
Klingon Frigate Evolution
Enjoy!
F-5 Technical Readout
Klingon Frigate Evolution
Enjoy!





