Plasma - SFB vs FC?

Discuss general information about the Federation Commander gaming system here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

BTS
Ensign
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:58 pm

Plasma - SFB vs FC?

Post by BTS »

Hi,

I was never much of an SFB player, so please bear with me if I am asking an “uninformed� question.

I was trying to get a better “tactical� handle on seeking plasma in FC by looking through the SFB rules on plasma. I understand they are two different game systems, but I was curious to hear from more experienced players how the differences (if any, really) play out between SFB’s rules (FP 1.5, etc) and FC’s rules (4J3, etc).

Obviously, SFB uses a range traveled chart for seeking plasma damage and FC uses an Impluse of Impact chart, but as a player, do you notice much in the way of difference between systems?
User avatar
Bolo_MK_XL
Captain
Posts: 835
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by Bolo_MK_XL »

The only thing you should concentrate on is the difference in fire/launch phases --
SFB every impulse/move you can launch
FC you/opponent have up to 4 moves to 1 fire/launch phase ---

The main issue is possibility of the target moving out of firing arc,
also having all energy as reserve gives everyone the option of accelerating/decelerating between firing phases ---

Putting yourself in a position to ensure a greater chance to hit with plasma is harder in FC than SFB, as the target has more options available to avoid having it happen ---
User avatar
Democratus
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:51 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Post by Democratus »

Another big difference is that speeds can be generally higher in FC. Ships can even go as fast as a Plasma Torpedo (impossible in SFB), making it much more difficult to get a hit with one.
User avatar
pinecone
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 2:09 pm
Location: Earth

Post by pinecone »

Not really. There are no Wild Weasels either.
User avatar
junior
Captain
Posts: 803
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 5:14 am

Post by junior »

Using a wild weasel was typically seen as a "bad thing" in SFB. It made your ship temporarily immune to seeking weapons, but it also badly hurt your speed and handed the initiative to your opponent. In Fed Com, you can pick whatever base speed you want at the start of your turn. You don't have that option in SFB, and instead the maximum speed that you can pick is influenced by your speed the previous turn.

Thus using a Wild Weasel can have a serious impact on how the battle plays out in SFB and is a lot more complicated than just throwing a decoy shuttle out the back hatch.


imo, the increase in ship speeds is the single most important change in Fed Com for plasma users to take into account. The ability of a ship to move at speed 32 (24+1) at will makes it much more difficult for torpedoes to hit at full or close to full damage unless you manage to somehow trick your opponent into playing Chicken with you.

And even then, your opponent will simply HET.
User avatar
Requete
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Leander, TX

Post by Requete »

junior wrote: And even then, your opponent will simply HET.
Although, probably not twice.
"In Klingon Empire, drone launches you!"

----

Pray the Chaplet of Divine Mercy:
http://www.catholicity.com/prayer/divinemercy.html
User avatar
junior
Captain
Posts: 803
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 5:14 am

Post by junior »

Are you kidding?

Given a 100% chance to have your ship gutted (i.e. one hundred points of plasma on the #1 shield) or a 50% chance to have your ship gutted (i.e. one hundred points of plasma on a random shield and an extra ten points of internals), which option would you take?


If my choices are between eating enough plasma to gut my ship or risking a breakdown, then I'll risk the breakdown every time.
storeylf
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1887
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:11 pm

Post by storeylf »

junior wrote:Are you kidding?

Given a 100% chance to have your ship gutted (i.e. one hundred points of plasma on the #1 shield) or a 50% chance to have your ship gutted (i.e. one hundred points of plasma on a random shield and an extra ten points of internals), which option would you take?

If my choices are between eating enough plasma to gut my ship or risking a breakdown, then I'll risk the breakdown every time.
If its 2 plamsa R or some other 100 points of damage, yes HET again. However it gets much more interesting when its a single F or S. Do you eat 20/30 damage or a second HET? what if he is holding another plasma until after you decide?
User avatar
Nerroth
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1722
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:46 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Nerroth »

I'd think the biggest difference would surely be the lack of the enveloper in FC.


Not that I'd argue the plasma powers miss it, mind you.
User avatar
eblack
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:11 pm

Post by eblack »

junior wrote:... imo, the increase in ship speeds is the single most important change in Fed Com for plasma users to take into account. The ability of a ship to move at speed 32 (24+1) at will makes it much more difficult for torpedoes to hit at full or close to full damage unless you manage to somehow trick your opponent into playing Chicken with you.

And even then, your opponent will simply HET.
I think this is generally the correct assumption about the differences between SFB and FC. In FC, your plasmas will not hit unless your opponent cannot move speed 24+1.

There are a number of ways in doing that... hitting him with other weapons and having him reinforce shields, tractoring, taking a hit to deliver one (i.e. getting into his preferred range to fire so that you may), manuevering him into a corner and so forth. With plasmas, you have to be patient and work your opponent's energy down or else you'll need to keep up a running plasma ballet or use bolts.
User avatar
junior
Captain
Posts: 803
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 5:14 am

Post by junior »

Tractoring is much more difficult in Fed Com as well. In SFB, tractor beams have range (three hexes, iirc). In Fed Com, they're restricted to one hex.

This did cause an amusing moment in one tactics discussion on the other forum. Back when I was soliciting suggestions as to how a Gorn ship might be able to beat an LDR vessel (final answer - it doesn't), someone suggested grabbing the LDR ship in a tractor beam and letting it more or less flail helplessly outside the effective range of the ESGs and Phaser-Gs. Sadly, I had to point out that tractor beams don't extend that far...
User avatar
eblack
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:11 pm

Post by eblack »

Agreed... I keep catching myself on the distance allowed for tractoring, thinking "He's at range 2, I'll just... oh wait...".
User avatar
pinecone
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 2:09 pm
Location: Earth

Post by pinecone »

The prob is if you break down you will Eat the plasa anyway... The reverse is also true I suppose.
User avatar
mjwest
Commodore
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by mjwest »

The major differences between plasma in Federation Commander and plasma in SFB are:
- no pseudo-torpedoes
- no wild weasels
- no envelopers
- no plasma shotgun
- no rolling delay
- no ECP
- no sabot

Quite frankly, I figure the lack of PPTs is actually the biggest difference. The whole guessing game of "are they or aren't they" colors everything that is done with plasma in SFB. That is totally gone in Federation Commander.

But, because of all of these differences, I don't think that studying plasma in SFB is going to really make a whole lot of difference in Federation Commander, as they are going to play very differently.

So, to play plasma in Federation Commander, you will pretty much just have to play plasma in Federation Commander.
Image
Federation Commander Answer Guy
User avatar
terryoc
Captain
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:46 am

Post by terryoc »

There's an article on plasma tactics in FC in Captain's Log #38.
"Captain" Terry O'Carroll, fourteen papers published including six best of issue
"Man, Terry, you are like a loophole seeking missle!" - Mike West
Image
Post Reply