Hellbore shield damage

Ask your questions about Federation Commander game system rules here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

Post Reply
User avatar
Kang
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1976
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:13 pm
Location: Devon, UK
Contact:

Hellbore shield damage

Post by Kang »

Step 4 of the Hellbore damage procedure (4K3d) says of the second damage number, 'The defending player [who owns the ship] applies one point of damage to each of the other shields until all shields have taken one damage point....if any points remain, repeat the process.

Which process? The whole damage process [i.e. the extra damage begins on the weaker shield] or the five-shield sharing out process?
Image
DrFaustus
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:35 pm

Post by DrFaustus »

point to a shield. Its ment to give a fairly even spread to the remain (non-weak sheilds)
User avatar
Davec_24
Commander
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:55 pm
Location: England

Post by Davec_24 »

Yes, I think it means "repeat the process of applying damage to the reamining five shields one point at a time, until you run out of hits". So say for example you had a normal hellbore hit a D7 at range 2, and the D7 has 5 points of damage on the #6 shield and no other damage, the damage would be 9+(8). The Klingon D7 would take the 9 points on the #6 shield as this it the weakest, leaving the remaining 8 damage points to be spread between 5 shields. So this must be one point on each of those 5 shields, plus 3 other damage points between the 5 shields. For example, the Klingon player could assign one of the remaining 3 points to the #1 shield, one to the #2 shield and one more to the #3 shield.

This would make the total damage allocation from the Hellbore hit 9 points on shield #6, 2 points on shield #1, 2 on the #2, 2 on the #3, and 1 damage point on each of shields #4 and #5.
User avatar
Davec_24
Commander
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:55 pm
Location: England

Post by Davec_24 »

Aaargh shortcuts! That "9+(8)" should actually have been "9+(*8*)", without the "*" symbols.
User avatar
junior
Captain
Posts: 803
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 5:14 am

Post by junior »

To get rid of that problem, click the "Disable Smilies in this post" check box at the bottom of the reply window.

8)
User avatar
Davec_24
Commander
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:55 pm
Location: England

Post by Davec_24 »

Cheers! 8) Only problem is, of course, what if you just want to disable that particular smile? Well it doesn't matter too much as most people would doubtless recognise common smile "shortcuts" and at any rate it's a good test of vocabulary to not use them at all ;-) Thanks for that by the way!
Post Reply