Re: FOUR QUESTIONS FOR OUR CUSTOMERS
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:15 am
Disclaimer: I didn't read the 9 pages of replies before posting. Sorry fellas.
Touching on the "game parts" theme above, check out the companies, like Gale Force 9, that are helping to make better game aids. (Updated Impulse cards for FC, plastic game pieces and expanded boards maybe).
I just received my copy of FC: Klingon Border, and I'm pleased overall. One thing: Is there any way to get the basic ship cards upgraded from statement size to 8.5x11? How much would this increase the games' overall cost?Steve Cole wrote: 1. What are we NOT doing that we SHOULD be doing?
Perhaps some more fluidity of the history of the SFU. I consider myself a vet of SFB (I played my first game around 1987), and I'm constantly stumbling over new stuff in the forums about races I never heard of.Steve Cole wrote:2. What ARE we doing that we should do DIFFERENTLY?
I like miniatures games. I like SFB and FC. I don't think they should mix. I hope I don't take the flames for this one, but I like SFB and FC because they are in every way not Warhammer. Warhammer has nice sculpts and a decent background (and surprisingly good novels). But I don't look to them for well-playtested rules, accessible Game Designers or anything approaching logic in their systems. I know I don't have to buy the miniatures to play (and I won't)...I just don't want ADB to become a miniature company.Steve Cole wrote:3. What ARE we doing that we should NOT be doing?
Steve Cole wrote:4. What new concept or idea should ADB investigate to improve its operations?
Touching on the "game parts" theme above, check out the companies, like Gale Force 9, that are helping to make better game aids. (Updated Impulse cards for FC, plastic game pieces and expanded boards maybe).