Shouldn't the ship designs have more variaty?

Starfury · Post by **Starfury** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:49 pm

That's very true.

If there's an argument over the game I'm betting they'd have sharper corners than dice and would make much better weapons.

malleman · Post by **malleman** » Wed Apr 29, 2009 10:42 pm

I am not sure I want die cast weapons.
I think Hod'Kel would want the die caster option mount for his Orions.

Truley, there would be no hope left for any of us

.

Hod K'el · Post by **Hod K'el** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:44 pm

Bwahahaha! (Evil smile, hysterical laughter, wild eyes!)

Scoutdad · Post by **Scoutdad** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:58 pm

But then he'd just complain that the die-cast launcher had been Nerfed when he found out that you're limited to a max of 2 die-cast launcher per unit and they have a LS/RS arc

malleman · Post by **malleman** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:21 pm

How true, we would never hear the end of it from Hod'Kel then!

Alex Knight · Post by **Alex Knight** » Sun May 03, 2009 8:47 pm

DorianGray wrote:Wow, I'd imagine some hard-core FedCom fans among the people that work at Paramount.

Sometimes I wonder. At the very least some of us in my area suspect some of the writers being SFB players. In one of the TNG episodes, Worf says something along the lines of "Photons overloaded, factor 16" or something like that. I'd have to check with my friend on it. But, that said - Overloaded photons? Factor 16? Yeah, that should be familiar to SFB/ FC players.

Dan Ibekwe · Post by **Dan Ibekwe** » Sun May 03, 2009 8:56 pm

Perhaps SVC can bill Paramount for stealing the term 'Romulan Warbird'?

Federation Commander

Shouldn't the ship designs have more variaty?

Option Mounts