NCC numbers were assigned in blocks (300 are frigates, 500 are destroyers, 700 are war destroyers), and not nearly in sequence (the 600s were used for X-destroyers years after the 700s were used for DWs, the 900s were used for CLs 50 years before the 700s were used for DWs).
Thank you, indeed ...
Search found 4 matches
- Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:35 pm
- Forum: Star Fleet Battles
- Topic: Federation CA Hull Numbers
- Replies: 41
- Views: 64126
- Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:32 am
- Forum: Star Fleet Battles
- Topic: Federation CA Hull Numbers
- Replies: 41
- Views: 64126
- Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:50 pm
- Forum: Star Fleet Battles
- Topic: Federation CA Hull Numbers
- Replies: 41
- Views: 64126
Thanks! I was thinking roughly along the same lines.
The description in Fast Warships for the Federation fast cruiser seems to contradict this, indicating that the fast cruisers were built in Y167, 168 & 169, 'replacing the normal CA's in the production schedule for those years'. Two of the three ...
The description in Fast Warships for the Federation fast cruiser seems to contradict this, indicating that the fast cruisers were built in Y167, 168 & 169, 'replacing the normal CA's in the production schedule for those years'. Two of the three ...
- Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:29 am
- Forum: Star Fleet Battles
- Topic: Federation CA Hull Numbers
- Replies: 41
- Views: 64126
Federation CA Hull Numbers
First of all, I'll apologize in advance if this is the wrong forum for this question (or if this seems silly). I'm just getting back into SFB after a long hiatus and I'm still feeling my way around.
I'm compiling a list of ship names that more or less matches up with the Order of Battle listed in ...
I'm compiling a list of ship names that more or less matches up with the Order of Battle listed in ...