Federation Commander Forum Index Federation Commander
A NEW fast paced board game of starship combat!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Negative Tractor and help on Tractors needed

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> Rules Questions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
qwirz
Ensign


Joined: 05 May 2018
Posts: 2
Location: Roma - ITALIA

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2018 10:21 pm    Post subject: Negative Tractor and help on Tractors needed Reply with quote

Hi all!
I'm quite new to FC and I have some trouble in understanding Tractor correct use.
1. What's the definition of "Negative Tractor"?
2. Tractored ships: Who wins? the ship which puts more energy in the tractoring auction or the ship which spends more energy for movement?
If ship A loses the auction and is tractored by ship B, but ship A spends more energy than ship B for movement, isn't ship A which governs movement?
Is the auction useless?
What am I missing?

Thanks

Ruben
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4074
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2018 5:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Negative Tractor is energy used to stop a tractor beam from being attached to a ship. It does NOT require the presence of, nor contribute to the use of a tractor. It is just the energy used to prevent a tractor beam from being established to a ship.

So, if Ship A tries to tractor Ship B using a point of energy, if Ship B expends its own point of energy in negative tractor, then Ship A's attempt to tractor Ship B fails. However, Ship A can then put another point into the tractor attempt, at which point Ship B can then put another point into negative tractor to block it. This process is the tractor auction. When the auction is done, if Ship A has put more power into the tractor attempt than Ship B has put into negative tractor, then the tractor beam is established. If, however, Ship B has put at least as much into negative tractor, then Ship B succeeds in preventing the tractor from being established. (In other words, negative tractor only has to match the amount of power used in the tractor attempt to succeed, but the tractor attempt must exceed the negative tractor in order to succeed.)

Establishing the tractor is independent from who controls movement. So, if Ship B has successfully tractored Ship A, but Ship A has spent more energy on movement, then Ship A controls movement. These are independent determinations.

As to who "wins"? That is dependent on what is being won. If by "wins", you mean who has won the tractor auction, then obviously the tractor has been established, so Ship B won the tractor auction. But, since Ship A is controlling the movement of the two ships, it can be a completely hollow win if Ship A does something with that movement which harms Ship B. On the other hand, Ship B, since it is the one that established the tractor, can always simply drop the tractor at any point irrespective of which ship is controlling movement.

But it all is dependent on what Ship B is trying to accomplish by establishing a tractor when it will not control movement. This could be very useful if it is trying to slow down Ship A or if it is trying to make sure it stays close to Ship A for the rest of the turn, and it doesn't matter where the pair of ships move. It can also be suicidal if Ship A can drive Ship B into something (like asteroids or a planet or close enough to a black hole or even seeking weapons targeted on it). But that determination is completely dependent on the circumstances.
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
qwirz
Ensign


Joined: 05 May 2018
Posts: 2
Location: Roma - ITALIA

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2018 11:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Commodore!
Really helpful and enlightening!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sgt_G
Commander


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 529
Location: Offutt AFB, Nebraska

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2018 11:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mjwest wrote:
Establishing the tractor is independent from who controls movement. So, if Ship B has successfully tractored Ship A, but Ship A has spent more energy on movement, then Ship A controls movement. These are independent determinations.
If memory serves, this is radically different in Star Fleet Battles (SFB). In that game, both ship get to move on their impulse but at an increased rate based on the total weight of both ships added together. If two Move-1 ships are locked in tractor, one moving at speed 12 and the other at speed 10, they will both move as if they are Move-2 ships, so at speeds 6 and 5. Having both ships controlling movement can create really weird tug-of-war situations.
_________________
Garth L. Getgen

Master Sgt, US Air Force, Retired -- 1981-2007 -- 1W091A
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4074
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2018 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sgt_G wrote:
mjwest wrote:
Establishing the tractor is independent from who controls movement. So, if Ship B has successfully tractored Ship A, but Ship A has spent more energy on movement, then Ship A controls movement. These are independent determinations.
If memory serves, this is radically different in Star Fleet Battles (SFB). In that game, both ship get to move on their impulse but at an increased rate based on the total weight of both ships added together. If two Move-1 ships are locked in tractor, one moving at speed 12 and the other at speed 10, they will both move as if they are Move-2 ships, so at speeds 6 and 5. Having both ships controlling movement can create really weird tug-of-war situations.

Yes, this is intentionally radically different from SFB because the SFB system is ludicrously complicated. By doing it this way in Federation Commander, it becomes significantly simpler to handle. Also note that Federation Commander eliminates tractor chains, too, so a given ship can only tractor, or be tractored by, one other ship.
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mike
Fleet Captain


Joined: 07 May 2007
Posts: 1675
Location: South Carolina

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2018 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yea for Federation Commander!
_________________
Mike

=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> Rules Questions All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group