| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
koogie
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 72
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:56 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| I really like that version! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecs05norway
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 87
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Slight variation:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Steve Cole
Site Admin
Joined: 11 Oct 2006
Posts: 3828
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like this look but remember that is not an "approval" just a quick glance. "Approval" takes a longer look by a panel of people.
We're probably going to get the store open next week and we're busy hoop jumping right now.
_________________
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ctchapel
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 16 Jun 2008
Posts: 84
Location: Federal Way, WA
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like to point out that Lyran impulse engines on the bigger ships are equal lateral hexagons, so when working on the "look" for your ships keep a clipboard with the piece parts that are common to the fleet. If your vision is to have flattened impulse engines, keep that thread constantly sized and shaped for every ship drawn.
From what I've seen so far you should have a good starter file of parts: impulse, ESGs, co-P2/3 mounts, disruptors, bridge, small warp, and Aztec-ing.
I've been thinking on how I would do the Lyran since I got my Drafting AAS 6 years ago before I got sick. I'm rooting for you, good work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecs05norway
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 87
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Good to hear so far. I'm considering dropping some of the aztecing on the rear hulls to make room to show tractor emitters and APR radiators. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecs05norway
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 87
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a rear view with the APR radiators added. Still working out what the tractor beam and mech link should look like.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djdood
Commodore
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3413
Location: Seattle, WA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Check the art that Adam Turner did for SFB module R11 ("Support Ships"). He depicted mech-link tractors as flat shapes (can't recall if square or hexagon), with some greeblie detailing inside their periphery.
_________________
  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecs05norway
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 87
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| djdood wrote: | | Check the art that Adam Turner did for SFB module R11 ("Support Ships"). He depicted mech-link tractors as flat shapes (can't recall if square or hexagon), with some greeblie detailing inside their periphery. |
Ah, cool. Thanks much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecs05norway
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 87
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With thanks to djdood:
I'm not quite satisfied with the phaser placement on there yet.
And I'm thinking of something for the nacelle pylon. Maybe just a strip down the trailing edge.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecs05norway
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 87
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
My muse needed a break from Lyrans.
Qari T-80 Command Cruiser. 68mm overall length, 35mm wide.
Yeah. My brain is a terrible, terrible place.
ETA: More pics.
Decided to spice up the warp nacelles a bit....
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Steve Cole
Site Admin
Joined: 11 Oct 2006
Posts: 3828
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ECS Norway: Drop me an email. We need to talk.
_________________
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mjwest
Commodore
Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4072
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My only criticism of the Qari ship is that all of the phasers are on the top of the ship. It literally has no weapons facing the entire hemisphere of the ship. While this is irrelevant to the game mechanics, but "in reality" at least some phasers should be mounted on the underside.
Also, what does your muse think of the Borak?
_________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecs05norway
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 87
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mjwest wrote: | My only criticism of the Qari ship is that all of the phasers are on the top of the ship. It literally has no weapons facing the entire hemisphere of the ship. While this is irrelevant to the game mechanics, but "in reality" at least some phasers should be mounted on the underside.
Also, what does your muse think of the Borak? |
It is a bit of a flaw, but a bottom placement would have issues with the warp nacelles being right in the firing arc. If the bottom was expanded the way my first sketch of the Lyrans was (which I think it might be, I'll have to recheck the art in C4) that might do it. Hmmm. Maybe on a widely bevelled corner, to give the L+RA/R+RA arcs of the rear phasers... Or just duplicate them top and bottom, but then you're showing more than are on the SSD.
Borak... hrm. Don't think I've had a chance to see them yet, to be honest. Which module are they from? Triangulum, Magellanic?
(ETA) So, okay, yeah, it -does- show an expanded bottom. Looks like the Ph-3's are there, and since they have a 360 arc... yeah, I think we can do this. Maybe work in a rotating turret while I'm at it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecs05norway
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 87
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Steve Cole wrote: | | ECS Norway: Drop me an email. We need to talk. |
Email dropped. *crash* Oops. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecs05norway
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 87
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now with a belly, and ventrally mounted phaser-3's and tractor emitters.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
