| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Steve Cole
Site Admin
Joined: 11 Oct 2006
Posts: 3828
|
 Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 6:57 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
We want to be "THE Ships Site" not "that weird ships site" which is the reputation we would have indelibly stained on our foreheads if we open without the Fed CA and Klingon D7. We got word this morning that further delays will push this to at least 1 June and are now looking at other options.
_________________
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
djdood
Commodore
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3413
Location: Seattle, WA
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First looks at the new Federation CA heavy cruiser model for the ADB Shapeways store -
This is the 1/3788-scale Starline 2400 size version, so it will print at exactly 3 inches long.
_________________
  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scoutdad
Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4754
Location: Middle Tennessee
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2017 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WOW!
Looking good, Will.
I can't wait to get one printed and post a side-by-side with the Mongoose version.
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JohnDDW
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 11 Feb 2017
Posts: 41
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| That does look great! Can't argue with the extra weapon slots either... as long as I get to use them! I'll just write out a new data card for ACTA, we'll call it the 'authoritarian' variant constitution class CA. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scoutdad
Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4754
Location: Middle Tennessee
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JohnDDW wrote: | | That does look great! Can't argue with the extra weapon slots either... as long as I get to use them! I'll just write out a new data card for ACTA, we'll call it the 'authoritarian' variant constitution class CA. |
Umm... what extra weapon slots?
Pretty sure ACTSF doesn't have that variant either.
And while not 100% certain... I'd bet the dude in charge won't ever let it have one either.
Not unless he's amply rewarded with copious amounts of lead / resin / pewter / and epoxy.
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scoutdad
Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4754
Location: Middle Tennessee
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Will, I assume it will be a multi-piece print?
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mjwest
Commodore
Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4072
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Scoutdad wrote: | | Umm... what extra weapon slots? |
That is a CAR. It has eight phasers and four photons. It does not have the phasers or drone rack from the refit. So, it has fewer weapons than the "CA" presented in Federation Commander (which, in SFB, is a CAR+).
So, I don't understand that original comment, either.
_________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djdood
Commodore
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3413
Location: Seattle, WA
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JohnDDW might be referring to the joke I made about it on the legacy discus bbs (nobody was commenting, so I said "it looks like nobody has noticed that I put 16 photon launchers on the thing"). I was kidding, of course.
This is indeed the CAR. I probably should have made it the CAR+ (I forgot that the final refit added even more phasers - thought I had all the bumps accounted for). Drone rack should probably get added too. Good catches, Mike.
To answer Tony's question; nope. It's intended to be a one-piece print and passes all the automated test to do so. There is always a chance of an issue during Shapeways' final manual checks before printing, but I tried to put enough margin into things to prevent issues.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scoutdad
Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4754
Location: Middle Tennessee
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| djdood wrote: | | To answer Tony's question; nope. It's intended to be a one-piece print and passes all the automated test to do so. There is always a chance of an issue during Shapeways' final manual checks before printing, but I tried to put enough margin into things to prevent issues. |
GREAT! Now I'm going to have to replace all 24 of my multi-piece 2400s and all 16 of my multi-piece 2500s...
Just to keep clumsy hands from breaking them at the game table.
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Steve Cole
Site Admin
Joined: 11 Oct 2006
Posts: 3828
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is actually a clever plot by Will and me to get people to continually buy new minis to replace the ones that break.
_________________
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scoutdad
Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4754
Location: Middle Tennessee
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Steve Cole wrote: | | This is actually a clever plot by Will and me to get people to continually buy new minis to replace the ones that break. |
Is there a divorce support group in Amarillo that one could point us too?
At least those of who expect to get divorced due to excessive miniatures acquisition.
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecs05norway
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 87
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Steve Cole wrote: | | This is actually a clever plot by Will and me to get people to continually buy new minis to replace the ones that break. |
Frankly I am sorely tempted for exactly this reason. The nacelle attachment on the Fed CA hulls and derivatives is a nightmare. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JohnDDW
Lieutenant JG
Joined: 11 Feb 2017
Posts: 41
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Scoutdad wrote: | | JohnDDW wrote: | | That does look great! Can't argue with the extra weapon slots either... as long as I get to use them! I'll just write out a new data card for ACTA, we'll call it the 'authoritarian' variant constitution class CA. |
Umm... what extra weapon slots?
Pretty sure ACTSF doesn't have that variant either.
And while not 100% certain... I'd bet the dude in charge won't ever let it have one either.
Not unless he's amply rewarded with copious amounts of lead / resin / pewter / and epoxy.
|
Heh yeah the joke from the other place, those aren't 16 torpedo launchers? Hmmm... lets just pretend they are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djdood
Commodore
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3413
Location: Seattle, WA
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since mjwest has seen this thread -
It should probably be moved under the general "miniatures" top-level category (something only an admin can do, if it can be done at all).
When I created it, I thought Shapeways was gonna be a Starline 2500 oriented thing - it very quickly evolved away from that and now includes both SL2400 and SL2500 scales (along with SL2450 non-scale ships).
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mjwest
Commodore
Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4072
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| djdood wrote: | | Since mjwest has seen this thread - |
I see all threads ...
| djdood wrote: | | It should probably be moved under the general "miniatures" top-level category (something only an admin can do, if it can be done at all). |
Moved!
I even renamed it to delete the "2500" reference. The "Ghost" in the old location eventually goes away.
_________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
