View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
raperm Ensign
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:38 pm Post subject: 1/2500 Fast D7 |
|
|
I actually thought of this as a perfect D7F from Star Fleet Battles; a slimmed-down, faster version of the D7. The bigger engines, the slimmer hull...yup, perfect. Sweet little model from Gizmotron; almost no clean-up needed. Comments, as always, are most welcome.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scoutdad Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 4755 Location: Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
too bad you can't soak it in water and shrink it down to 1:3788th.
Great job on painting it. _________________ Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djdood Commodore
Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 3418 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lean and mean. I'm not usually one for green on Klingons, but as-always it's executed so well on yours. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
OGOPTIMUS Captain
Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 980
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Absolutely great.
The lighter green also looks very nice. _________________ O.G. OPTIMUS
Newest Page | Newer Page | OLD Page |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SWO_Daddy Lieutenant SG
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 195 Location: Stuttgart, Germany
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sweet as always Mike! _________________ Check out my website at: http://www.jgray-sfb.com/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
markgeorgetwo Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Posts: 372 Location: london england
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:05 pm Post subject: post subject |
|
|
Very nice i think it would make a nice fast D7 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve Cole Site Admin
Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3839
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Very nicely done! _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
justicar Lieutenant JG
Joined: 06 Feb 2008 Posts: 37 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Love that model, love that paint job. Awesome work. _________________ The previous page has been superseded by the following page:
This page intentionally left blank. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wolverin61 Commander
Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Posts: 495 Location: Mississippi
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
justicar wrote: | Love that model, love that paint job. Awesome work. |
Nice avatar! _________________ "His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scoutdad Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 4755 Location: Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Mike... I've wondered how big the 1"2500 ships are. Any chance at getting a single, overhead photo showing the 1:2500 D7 and a 1:3788 D7 together? _________________ Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djdood Commodore
Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 3418 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
1/2500 is pretty big, by our standards. That's the scale of the Ertl/MPC/Polar-Lights 3-ship Enterprise model kit sets. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
malleman Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 12 Jan 2008 Posts: 307 Location: Lafayette, LA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
scoutdad,
I think it its almost twice as long as the ADB D-7 (the boom is long). I have a couple of them at the house. The width is not quiet as noticable. I believe if you altered the boom and engine lengths the size would be more comparable. When I get a chance I will take pics to show you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
raperm Ensign
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scoutdad wrote: | Hey Mike... I've wondered how big the 1"2500 ships are. Any chance at getting a single, overhead photo showing the 1:2500 D7 and a 1:3788 D7 together? |
Tony,
I would, but I don't have any smaller minis to take a pic of it with. I can tell you it's about twice as long, though. They work great for single-ship dueling, but for squadron or fleets, they're probably too big...unless you've built one hell of a big table to game on! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scoutdad Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 4755 Location: Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Mike.
That's exactly the info I needed. I've had a couple of opportunities to get some of the 1:2500 stuff and have avoided doing so, since I'm too lazy to back-calculate the size differnce between the two scales.
I may pick up a couple to paint and posibly use for duels a our FLGS to drum up interest, but it certainly looks as if mixing the 1:2500 and the Starline stuff is out. _________________ Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
justicar Lieutenant JG
Joined: 06 Feb 2008 Posts: 37 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the compliment, Wolverine.
1/2500 = 1.5152x the length of a 1/3788 model.
I once asked after the size of ADB's D7 and was told 57mm (2-1/4") for the old one and 48mm (1-7/8") long for the new one. Assuming a length of 228m, a 1/3788 mini should actually be 60mm (2-3/8") long. But considering the we're talking scales for starships in the huge expanse of space...
A 289m Connie should be 76mm (3") long in 1/3788 and 116mm (4.5") long in 1/2500.
I personally feel that 1/2500 is great for the classic duel and that 1/3788 should be for squadrons, but AoG (with B5W) and Mongoose (with ACTA) both used pretty large models for gaming Babylon 5. To each his own. _________________ The previous page has been superseded by the following page:
This page intentionally left blank. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|